Friday, October 29, 2010

Rape Culture 101 -- Is this what they fought for?

by Connie Chastain*

In the run-up to the elections, America's wars have fallen off the radar screen. But when it's politically fashionable to talk about them, you're apt to hear Presidents and other government officials refer to "our men and women in uniform." This in spite of the fact that the Armed Forces are overwhelmingly male and men do the bulk of the fighting and dying.

Still, women do make up about 20% of today's military. You have to wonder why they would fight for a patriarchal culture -- indeed, what they deem to be a rape culture that preys on women and keeps them in fear. Of course, we know that what feminists complain about and reality are different things. First, there is no rape culture and, second, government, education, business and industry promote, or at least accomodate, institutional female supremacy, so... so much for patriarchy.

Despite the lip service to the feminised military, war is men's business. It always has been, and there was a time when everyone acknowledged that. Sometimes things happen to remind us of this particular reality.

In October of 1943, a Consolidated B-24 Liberator heavy bomber went missing near New Guinea. It was assumed that the plane ran out of fuel on the way back to base and crashed in the Pacific Ocean. Searches yielded no trace of the aircraft, and a year later, the eleven crewmen and the photographer who joined them on a reconnaissance mission were officially declared dead, their families notified.

They were among the over 300,000 U.S. casualties of that terrible war which, for the United States, lasted from from December 7, 1941 until August 14, 1945. Eventually, the surviving soldiers returned home. They built the suburbs and created a wheeled culture where they, as breadwinners, drove the freeways into town to office and factory, while their wives stayed home to raise children. Based largely on knowledge gained in the war, they invented goods and services and made advances in medicine, transportation, housing that made their society the envy of the world.

But not everyone was amazed by these advances, or thankful to the men who made them possible. Twenty-five years later, too many daughters of these warriors, these protectors and advancers of our society, were calling them patriarachal oppressors. These women raised such a ruckus that men who had seen and experienced the horrors of brutal, global war bent over backward to accomodate their whiny complaints.

Fast forward another thirty years, and find a America not at all friendly to the grandsons and great-grandsons of the global warriors of WWII. It is a society in which men bear the brunt of military and workplace deaths, but feminists complain because not enough women occupy desks in corporate offices; a culture where boys and young men are given short shrift in education; where the government creates jobs for women during a recession in which men disproportionately find themselves without a job.

It is a society that feminists label a rape culture and wherein they describe men as possessors of "flawed" masculinity -- predators who keep all women in a state of fear. It is a society where, increasingly, women can and do make false rape accusations and face little or no consequence for destroying, or almost destroying, some innocent man's life.

Not long ago, the families of the crew of the bomber lost near New Guinea were notified that the plane had not gone down in the Pacific, after all. Wreckage of the plane had been located in rugged, jungle-covered mountains on the northern end of the island. Human remains were found. Using DNA testing, all members of the crew were identified and their families in the United States notifed that their soldiers would be coming home at last.

Among the crewmen was a gunner from Georgia by the name of Berthold Chastain, my uncle. I only recently learned of the true story of his sacrifice. Our family is still trying to grasp the new information that he was not lost at sea sixty-seven years ago, as we have believed for so long.

As I contemplate this new chapter in our family history, I can't help but wonder. Is the United States today really what he, and 600,000 others fought for, and so many died for? I cannot help but believe it is not, and for that I am profoundly sorry. As a society, we have not done right by these men.

Welcome home at last, Uncle Bert. Please forgive us.

The story of the last mission of the B-24 bomber, the "Shack Rat" --

*Connie is a member of the FRS team whose column appears here every Friday. Her blog is

Sentenced for false rape report in Abbotsford

A woman who falsely reported to police that she had been sexually assaulted by a stranger in July 2009 said she did it because she didn't think anyone would believe the real story – that she had been date raped.

Tammi Zall, 24, who previously pleaded guilty to public mischief, was sentenced today (Tuesday) in Abbotsford provincial court to a four-month conditional sentence. Judge Richard Romano said her actions tied up an "enormous" amount of police manpower and left the public fearful that a rapist was on the loose.

"You said it best: This was a huge mistake," Romano said in addressing Zall, who apologized in court for her behaviour.

The court heard that Zall phoned 911 on July 29, 2009 at about 4 a.m., reporting that she had been raped by a man who forced his way into her first-floor apartment on Robertson Avenue through her balcony door.

Ten police units were called to the scene. Zall told investigators that the intruder, whom she did not know, pushed her down on the bed and raped her for about 15 minutes before leaving through the balcony door.

She provided a detailed description of the assailant, and was taken to Abbotsford Regional Hospital for a sex assault examination.

Abbotsford Police issued a press release, warning the public that a sexual offender – referred to in media reports as the "balcony rapist" – had struck.

Police then received numerous tips and phone calls from a concerned public. They detained two suspects who matched the description, but were able to rule them out as suspects.

Meanwhile, Zall told a different story to a family member, who then contacted police on Aug. 2 about the discrepancies in her story. Zall repeated the adapted story to police on Aug. 5.

This time, she said the sexual assault involved a man she knew and had reported to the police on July 22, 2009 for harassment. She said the man came to her home on July 29 and she allowed him in because she had been drinking earlier in the evening and her judgment was impaired.

A while later the two became intimate, but Zall said she changed her mind during the act and asked for him to stop. Instead, he continued for several minutes. He then left her apartment.

She told police that she had felt violated and used, but because she had put herself in the situation, didn't think she would be taken seriously. She said she wanted to be treated like a rape victim and not be overlooked.

The false story "just came out" and picked up momentum, she said.

Police charged her that day with public mischief. They also interviewed the man Zall had named as her assailant, but he said he had never had sexual relations with her and offered to take a polygraph test.

During Tuesday's sentencing, Crown counsel Elizabeth Rennie said there were some obvious concerns about pursuing a case based on Zall's second story.

"Sadly, because of the history of the actions of Miss Zall, her credibility is a signficiant issue."

Zall apologized to the court for her actions.

"I'm just very sorry. It was a very big mistake and I regret it to the end," she said, breaking down in tears.

The judge said Zall's remorse was "sincere and genuine" and he agreed with both the Crown and the defence that a jail sentence would not be necessary. He ruled that she be electronically monitored during her four-month sentence.

Zall is confined to her residence for the first 45 days, unless she has authorization for family, personal or employment reasons. For the remainder of her sentence, she must abide by a curfew of 7 p.m. to 7 a.m.


Thursday, October 28, 2010

Police seek author of e-mail about three sexual assaults

GAUTIER — Police on Wednesday were warning residents of an e-mail circulating about three alleged sexual assaults in the city that police do not believe occurred.

The e-mail was widely distributed at Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, warning residents to be cautious, police said. Police are asking residents to stop sending the e-mail.

Police, however, are asking for tips to find who might have authored the false report. The e-mail indicated that there had been three sexual assaults in the city in the last week.


Wednesday, October 27, 2010

College student's rape lie jailed classmate for no apparent reason

A young man was arrested in class on the basis of a classmate's rape lie.  He was jailed with bond set sufficiently high to insure he wouldn't get out before trial.  He was there for almost one month before police figured out it didn't happen. The woman admitted that she didn't even know her victim.  This appears to have been a random, and senseless attempt to destroy a young man's life.  The most puzzling aspect of the case is the insistence of law enforcement that police had probable cause to deprive a young man of his liberty while the investigation was still ongoing.  We are not told what this purported probable cause was, but if it was the word of the accuser, that is more than just problematic.

Do you suppose the victim of this crime will ever be the same?  This is among the more dispicable false rape claims we've reported lately.

Alleged MSU rape victim admits to lying

Lake Charles, La. — On Thursday, September 23, the Calcasieu Parish Sheriff's Office arrested Tyler J. Leger, 19, of Lake Charles, for the alleged rape of a McNeese State University student. Last week his accuser was arrested after admitting to fabricating her story.

 "I can tell you without reservation we absolutely had probable cause to arrest this man based on the information we had and that's unfortunate for him," said Calcasieu Parish Sheriff Tony Mancuso in a press conference Tuesday.

With information given to deputies by the alleged victim, Kolbie M. Wade, 18, of Lake Charles, Leger was arrested without incident at McNeese while he was attending class. He was booked into the Calcasieu Correctional Center and charged with forcible rape. He remained in jail on a $750,000 bond set by Judge Michael Canaday.

After the arrest of Leger, and while the investigation was continuing forward, more information regarding the case became available to detectives. With this information, detectives interviewed several new witnesses which led to another interview with Wade. She continued to allege she was raped by Leger.

After the witnesses' information was verified to be true, detectives met with the District Attorney's Office on Tuesday, October 19, to discuss the case. After reviewing the facts of the case, it was decided the rape charge against Leger should be dismissed. Leger was immediately released from jail.

On October 20, the day after Leger was released from jail, Wade admitted to detectives she had fabricated the story of the rape. She confirmed that she did not know Leger and did not give a reason why she made up the story. Wade was arrested and booked into the Calcasieu Correctional Center and charged with criminal mischief. She bonded out later that day. She has no prior criminal history.

The Sheriff's Office is still in discussion with the District Attorney's office on other possible charges against Wade. One charge concerns the altercation of a public document. The other is the false swearing for purposes of violating public health and safety.

"These are more serious charges than the filing of a false police report," said Mancuso.

"I think it's important for the public to know that we have a safe campus. I think the McNeese police department does a great job and McNeese does a great job with ensuring the safety of our kids that go to school there," he added.

"I think our detectives did a great job, not just in the beginning of this case but following through with the case and subsequently figuring out that this crime did not occur."

"We need to make sure that women in our community understand that they need to report when an allegation of rape occurs and let us investigate it. Women need to be protected and our society needs to be protected from predators," said Mancuso. "What can't happen, obviously, is people fabricating stories and making up things."

"Incidents of false reporting are taken seriously because someone's freedom is ultimately taken away here for a period of time," according to MSU Chief of Police Cinnamon Salvador.

CPSO Detective Michael Primeaux is the lead investigator on this case.

How to smear a conservative running for Governor? Talk about her presumptively innocent son as if he's a rapist, of course

Meg Whitman, the GOP candidate for Governor of California, has been hit by another storm of nasty rumors, just in time for the election next week. Whitman’s son, Griffith Harsh, a former student at Princeton University, was accused of brutally attacking and raping a former classmate at that venerable institution back in 2006.  The "report" of this incident is found here.

The implication of the report is that Griffith got away with rape because his mother was a major donor at the school.

Let's briefly, and quickly, dissect the story to demonstrate the ways the progressive electronic media is even less responsible than the progressive print media when it comes to discussing the presumptively innocent accused of rape.  (If that's possible.)  From the story:

"On a spring night in 2006, Griff—then a sophomore—went partying on the Street, a boozy row of private undergraduate dining clubs. As he would later tell a panel of university disciplinarians, he ran into a classmate and went home with her. They had sex. She awoke the next morning with a black eye, bruised face and, she told friends, no memories from the previous night. According to multiple sources—one of whom was a dormitory adviser at the time—the girl told her friends Griff Harsh had raped her.

Let's stop right there.  They were partying. They went home. They had sex. The anonymous girl had no memory of what happened.  But then, we are led to believe that she legitimately thought she had been raped?  From what?  There is no evidence whatsoever that she was in a near comatose state at the time they had sex.  None. 

Should we assume she was raped because of the bruises?  Because, you know, comatose women who are raped always incur bruising, right?  Even a friend of the unnamed woman said this: "She had clearly hurt herself badly. Or been hurt badly."  Gee, it's one or the other, so let's just assume it had to be that she had "been hurt badly," and that she had been badly hurt during a rape. Right?

The story goes on: "A friend who spent time with her the following morning spoke to us under the condition of anonymity: 'She woke up with him on top of her, and he was like, "You need the morning-after pill." And she was like, "Why, what happened?" She didn't remember having sex, she didn't remember consenting, she didn't remember any of it."

See?  Of course he's a rapist.  Because they were drinking, because they went home, and because they had sex, and because she can't remember what happened.  Of course this awful predator must have taken advantage of the poor, innocent-as-a-lamb young woman.

Here's Griff's side of the story: "[H]e thought she had been sober enough to consent." He and the unnamed girl had had "two sexual encounters prior" to this incident. As for her injuries? "He attributed her injuries to an accidental fall."

She didn't go to the police. She didn't have a rape kit prepared.  Why?  Because, supposedly, she didn't want to go through the mess of accusing the son of a powerful person. (And, you see, that might have allowed police to, you know, hold her claim up to the scrutiny of an investigation.)  She didn't want to put herself through that, but she was OK with putting herself through a university disciplinary hearing -- at the very university where the alleged rapist's mother was a powerful donor. Get it? 

Or did she choose that route because, with a disciplinary proceeding at a university, she figured she could destroy Griff in a more accuser-friendly atmosphere? 

At that disciplinary hearing, it was presumably her word (which was that she couldn't remember what happened) against his (which was that he believed she consented). 

The disciplinary panel, which treats its matters as confidential, apparently concluded that it did not have enough evidence to discipline Griff Harsh.

But, of course, that Web site hasn't done enough damage to a young man's reputation.  The article goes on to describe other brushes with the law Griff has had. The fact that these don't relate to the sexual assault of any woman, much less this woman, is beside the point. See, when you gotta smear someone, any mud will do.

Here's loopy Salon's take on it: "The actions of adult children shouldn't be used to cast aspersions on the character of their parents, but the sight of a wealthy young man who keeps getting away with everything puts the lie to a gubernatorial campaign predicated on the idea that wealth and business acumen go hand in hand with American virtues like responsibility and hard work."

See?  Griff got away with "everything," including, presumably, rape. All because he found himself on the losing "he" side of a "he said/she said" rape accusation.  (For "he said/she said" rape accusations, the "he" side is akin to the Washington Generals playing the Harlem Globetrotters.)

"If I'm to be branded a rapist, for the rest of my life then there should be some evidence of it," Harsh said in a 2006 statement.  See here.

Why on earth would you think that, Griff?  You obviously are not a regular reader of this blog, are you?  Maybe you should be.

Man arraigned for sex with minor following false rape report

A Vista man was arraigned Thursday on one count of unlawful sexual intercourse with a girl he met online who initially told authorities she had been raped by three strangers.

Jose A. Cano, 20, pleaded not guilty to charges he lured a 15-year-old Encinitas girl he met online to meet him and have consensual sex last Friday. He was ordered held without bail while authorities decide if he is in the country illegally.

Shortly after her parents reported her missing last Friday, the girl turned up and claimed she had been abducted by three men and raped, prompting sheriff's deputies to launch a multi-prong effort to find the attackers the girl had described. She eventually admitted making up the story.

Deputy District Attorney Katherine Flaherty said the girl is "doing as well as can be expected."

A laptop believed to belong to Cano has been seized and authorities are researching its hard drive to determine if Cano tried to lure other underage girls into sexual trysts, Flaherty said after Cano's brief court appearance before Judge Joan Weber at the Vista Courthouse.

A decision on whether the girl will be charged with filing a false report has not yet been made, Flaherty said.

"The investigation is ongoing and she is a necessary witness in this case," Flaherty said. "The reality is that at times children do fabricate stories if they think they are going to get into trouble."

The girl told authorities she made up the story of being abducted to avoid having to tell her family what really happened.

Flaherty, who often is assigned to sex crime cases, said the girl's fabrication is uncommon.

"The vast majority of sexual assault victims come to this courthouse and testify truthfully about what happened to them," she said.

Another lesson from the case is that parents need to exercise constant oversight of their children's use of the Internet, Flaherty said.

"Parents can't be too vigilant," she said.

Authorities are continuing to study whether Cano will face additional charges, which could include contacting a minor online with the intent to commit a sex crime.

The crime he is charged with can be prosecuted either as a misdemeanor or a felony, Flaherty said. A decision on which way to go hasn't been made, she said.

If the case is treated as a misdemeanor and he is convicted, Cano would face a maximum of 12 months in the county jail. If it's handled as a felony and he's convicted, he could face up to three years in state prison.

Authorities say Cano met the teen through, which touts itself as "the world's largest mobile social network."

Cano has been in trouble before. He was arrested in December on misdemeanor methamphetamine charges. On Jan. 5, he pleaded guilty to a reduced charge of disorderly conduct and was sentenced to time served.

After he was released, agents from the federal Immigrations and Customs Enforcement returned him to Mexico.

He is under an immigration hold again, but if that is released, the judge set his bail at $20,000.

Cano's parents and other family members attended Thursday's arraignment. There was no sign of the girl or her family in the courtroom.

[FRS Comment] - One has to wonder, just how old, this young woman told Mr. Cano she was?


Tuesday, October 26, 2010

Constant 'law enforcement' debate is derailing our message

For several months we have witnessed a spike in the number and intensity of the comments about the role of "law enforcement" in fomenting a false rape culture. We have stood by and watched as the comments derailed one post after another with this debate, which is often unrelated to the post where the debate erupts.  Some of the comments have been reasonable and intelligent; however, too often they degenerate into sweeping, blanket criticisms of law enforcement, posited without nuance, and intended to provoke a debate with one particular commentator.

I would love to continue doing this blog, and doing what I consider to be important work in exploring the false rape phenomenon, like this.  But based on what I am seeing, the most interested segment of our audience seems to be focused on a single issue that I think misses the big picture. I have no interest in focusing on the issue that this group seems intent on constantly debating.

Trust me: I can post a story about an innocent guy being murdered by vigilantes because of a false rape claim, and the comments would end up being about law enforcement.

Maybe this blog has done all it can do in spreading the message, and maybe our audience has become desensitized to the horrors of false rape claims. I understand. And this is not a threat. I don't have a compulsive need to continue doing this blog, and I am incredibly busy with other things.  I always found the time to do this, even when I was traveling, when I thought it was helping to spread the word.  But right now, I have to be honest: I feel like I'm wasting my time here.

The false rape culture explained

"WHEN did we start to dislike men so much that we're happy for them not to be part of our children's lives?"

"The distrust of males has been creeping up on us, fanned by the sick minds of a few who have stolen the innocence of children, and left heartache in their wake." 

A must-read:

Woman accused of making false rape report against three men

A 30-year-old Gaffney, S.C., woman told Gastonia Police on Sunday three men raped her, but the story was false, according to an arrest warrant.

The woman was served with an arrest warrant on Tuesday for making a false report to a police station. She was released from custody without having to post bond.

Police determined her story did not add up and she later confessed that it was untrue, according to a Gastonia Police report.

No one else was questioned in the case.


Monday, October 25, 2010

About Law Enforcement: A Letter To Our Readers

Recently on this blog, there has been an ongoing argument about whether Law Enforcement properly handles false rape accusations, and criminal investigations in general.

While the anger that those who have been falsely accused is certainly understandable, the constant blaming of Law Enforcement, is, to put it bluntly, misplaced. The blame for a false accusation belongs in one place and one place only: on the person who makes the complaint.

Read that again, and let it sink in.

The person responsible for a false accusation is the person who files the complaint. Until such time as a person either goes to the police and files a claim, or goes to the hospital and says they were raped, it is more than likely that the police will never become involved. It takes a specific action by one party (with a report of rape), to elicit a reaction from Law Enforcement (an investigation of an alleged rape).

Does Law Enforcement get it wrong sometimes? Of course it does. Police are human, and, therefore, fallible. And this site is more than willing to call them out on it when they do. But this does not mean that police constantly go out of their way  to persecute innocent men.**

The thing that we must keep in mind is that this site is not about bashing Law Enforcement. The simple fact is that without them, this site would not exist. It is the police who uncover that allegations of rape are false in almost every we post here (some are discovered during a trial, or after conviction, but those are much less frequent). Either they uncover evidence that proves the complaint false, or while investigating, they uncover something that doesn’t add up/make sense, and that is usually enough for the accuser to admit she or he lied.

Therefore, overall, they are getting it right. To state otherwise devalues what this site stands for: support and recognition of those who have been falsely accused of rape, or sexual assault, be they man or woman. We have fought too hard to make this a credible site, and the constant attack on Law Enforcement, is damaging that effort.

If you wish to comment on the specific case, and the way it was handled, feel free. If you wish to discuss arrest policies, and what needs to be changed, feel free. If Law Enforcement did something wrong in a specific article, then go ahead and bring it up.

But keep in mind that almost always, they did get it right, sooner or later, or the story wouldn’t be posted.

** It is understood that the vast majority of false rape accusations are made against men.

P.S. – As an aside, I hate to go to comment moderation, but if this constant back and forth continues to derail comment threads, it may be necessary. While I am all for open discussion, the vision of where this site is going is too great to risk over people who hate LE. There are sites better suited to express that attitude, and it only makes our job more difficult.

Friday, October 22, 2010

Rape Culture 101 -- Internecine conflict as entertainment

by Connie Chastain*

I subscribe to Google Alerts for about five different subjects. One of them is feminism and I'm notifed weekly of the items found by Google's search programs relating to this subject.

As an ardent anti-feminist, I'm intrigued by the rumbling going on of late in the feminist quarter of western hegemony. Judging by the alerts in my in-box, there appears to be a multi-sided battle brewing. It's the aging second wavers vs. the smart-aleck third wavers, certainly. But it's also between liberal feminists on the left and conservative ones on the right.

As interesting as it is to watch the old gals and the young twits square off, for the next few weeks -- the run-up to the U.S. elections -- I'll have to give more attention to the political cat fight.

In the words of Howard Dietz, That's Entertainment! I won't say it's as entertaining as SEC football of a Saturday afternoon. It might run even with old MGM musicals, and it has spectator golf beat hands down. Hey, when you live in a dark and oppressive rape culture, you have to get your entertainment however you can so I have popped up some Jiffy-Pop, poured cola on ice, propped my feet up, and settled back to watch the Feminist Wars.

Conservative feminists? Who knew there could even be such an animal? Feminism has been the purview of the left for generations. Everybody knew conservative women, whose brains were damaged by housework, stayed home, raised kids and volunteered down at the church. Voting was the extent of their political involvement.

But we're seeing some strange things happening now. Women who don't spout the orthodox feminist line are emerging as political candidates, raising money (tons of it, jaw-dropping mountains of it) and making their voices heard with the electorate. And quite a few stand a good chance of getting elected to everything from the U.S. Senate to governors' offices to county commissions to local soil and water boards....

As I've stated before, I believe that the core of feminism is the hatred of men as a group, or hatred of masculinity itself. That is why abortion is the number one cause of feminism -- not equality for women, not opportunity for women, not giving women greater choice, but abortion: the removal from the uterus material put there by a male. Everything else on the feminist agenda, including the claims of rape culture, serves this cause.

But conservative women seeking office, and their numberless supporters, don't talk much about abortion, or rape culture, or the glass ceiling, or any of issues old-time feminists constantly moan about. They talk about reducing the size of government, lowering taxes, enacting sane health care legislation, putting power back into the hands of states, counties, municipalities -- in short, not only ignoring the orthodox feminist agenda, but supporting policies that would undermine feminist power by knocking government support (i.e., funding) out from under it.

Would these Mama Grizzlies make good elected officials? I dunno. I haven't paid close attention to politics since 1998, when I was a Congressional staffer and saw enough of federal politics to last me the rest of my life. And frankly, I prefer male leaders. But if I had to choose between a male liberal and a female conservative, I'd probably vote for the latter.

Fortunately, I don't have to delve that deeply into it. I've turned cynic enough to view the whole of western politics as a joke. I'm much more interested in the culture wars, and politics is important to me only to the extent it affects the culture.

I've seen speculation that the rise of conservative feminists means the old feminism is on the way out; that it has achieved what it set out to achieve, and is no longer needed -- that it has basically outlived its usefulness and will be elbowed aside by more relevant movements.

I don't know about that but I do know we have a lot of damage to undo, not the least of which is the damage done to men by feminist get-evenism supported by the power of government. Maybe electing conservative women to office is part of the solution, maybe not. But I'm for anything that undermines the power that institutional feminism has wrenched for itself over the decades.

If you've got some Jiffy-Pop and cola, and you'd like to join me in watching what's turning out to be a highly entertaining interlude, follow the links below (and you can Google to find lots more).

Feminism's Mother-Daughter Divide -- Susan Faludi
High heels and high hopes -- Suzanne Fields
Feminist Groups Call Conservative Women ‘Nutty’ and ‘Whores,’ Media Ignores -- Alana Goodman
Sarah Palin vs. Emily's List: a Twitter 'feminist' feud
Oxymoron of 2010: feminist conservative -- Beverly McPhail
Real Mama Grizzlies -- Karoli (the video's a real hoot! Enjoy! ~Connie)

Connie is a member of the FRS team whose column appears here every Friday. Her blog is

Dallas district attorney's office says man was wrongly convicted in '90 case

The Dallas County district attorney's office says it will ask a judge on Monday to release a 39-year-old deaf man who prosecutors believe was wrongly convicted of sexually assaulting a child.

Stephen Matthew Brodie pleaded guilty in 1993 to abducting a 5-year-old girl from her Richardson home and making her perform a sex act in September 1990.

His attorney, Dallas County public defender Michelle Moore, said that Brodie was interrogated for 18 hours over eight days and only half of the time was there a sign language interpreter present.

"We believe this is not a true confession," Moore said. "Stephen speaks an entirely differently language."

Moore said Thursday that evidence now points to Brodie's innocence. She said the district attorney's office told her a fingerprint found at the scene matches that of 41-year-old Robert Warterfield, a convicted child rapist who in the mid-1990s was also named as a suspect in the "North Dallas rapist" attacks on nearly a dozen other children.

Warterfield could not be reached for comment. He pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child in 1994 for abducting a teenage girl from her home and molesting her. He was given 10 years' probation in that case and never charged in the other attacks.

Moore said Brodie falsely confessed to the abduction and sexual assault in exchange for a five-year sentence. She said his original defense attorney wasn't told about the fingerprint match before Brodie accepted the plea.

Brodie has already served the five-year sentence. But he is currently serving time for failing to register as a sex offender in Lamar County. It is his third conviction, Moore said, for "stubbornly refusing to register for a crime he didn't commit."

Moore says Brodie's confession was made at time when he was being questioned about other cases, too, and when there was no sign language interpreter present.

She said tests performed before the original trial showed that a hair from a blanket the girl was forced to take with her when abducted did not belong to Brodie or anyone in the girl's family – and Brodie's defense attorney at the time was never told that, either.

If State District Judge Lena Levario and the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals agree that Brodie was wrongly convicted, he could become the third man exonerated in Dallas County without the benefit of DNA testing to clear his name. The county also has 20 DNA exonerations – more than any other county in the nation since 2001 when Texas began allowing post-conviction DNA testing.

It is unclear whether prosecutors knew about the information withheld from Brodie's attorney, or whether police failed to turn over the information to the district attorney's office. Information that could benefit a defendant is legally required to be handed over following a 1963 U.S. Supreme Court decision, Brady vs. Maryland.

Mike Ware, who oversees the conviction integrity unit at the district attorney's office, declined to discuss the investigation in detail. But he said there was "no reason" for Brodie to become a suspect in the first place.

"I anticipate part of the proof will be that the person we believe to be the actual perpetrator has been identified," Ware said.

Richardson police Sgt. Kevin Perlich, spokesman for the department that arrested Brodie, declined to comment other than to say that the department has been working with the district attorney's office.

Moore said there was a previous hearing on the case in the mid-'90s after Brodie's attorneys learned about the fingerprint. But Moore said that then Levario ruled that because Brodie confessed, the confession outweighed the other information.

According to a Dallas Morning News story at the time, Levario ruled that Brodie knew about the existence of the then-unidentified fingerprint before he pleaded guilty and he knew that prosecutors had shared their information about his false statements with his defense attorney.

Moore said Thursday that the fingerprint match was made before the guilty plea, but added that Brodie and his attorneys only knew that a fingerprint other than Brodie's own existed.

Levario said at the time that other evidence linked Brodie to the crime, including statements from the victim that indicated her attacker had an unusual voice and a drawing that resembled a giraffe on his arm. Brodie's attorney at the time conceded that he drew animals on his arms.

Levario could not be reached for comment Thursday evening.

Moore said that since the first ruling, more weight has been given to the possibility of false confessions. She said that since 2001, police manuals have routinely included information warning them about suspects falsely admitting to a crime.

Moore became Brodie's attorney in February after the district attorney's office received a letter from Brodie's father asking prosecutors to look again at the case.

For Brodie to be released, Lamar County would have to agree. That seems likely, Moore said.

Lamar County and District Attorney Gary Young could not be reached for comment Thursday.

After the sexual assault, the girl immediately told her parents about the molestation, and they called 911. Moore said the girl did not get a good look at the man but said "he had a low voice, he was fat, had a big stomach and he was white."

Brodie became a suspect when he was arrested for breaking into a soft drink machine at a public swimming pool in Richardson not far from where the child was abducted.

If Brodie is released Monday, Moore said, he will have the support of his father and friends. She also said the county's other exonerees will help him adjust.

"The guys are very eager to meet him, and he's got some friends," she said.

Moore said that Brodie, who could shoe horses for a living, is eager to get a job.

"I think he's a little bit scared," she said. "But very anxious to get out."


Thursday, October 21, 2010

Great Ashby sexual assault claims turn out to be false

A POLICE investigation into a report of sexual assault off Great Ashby Way in Stevenage on Tuesday has confirmed that no crime has taken place.

Police were informed on Wednesday of the allegation, after which specialist detectives from the Sexual Offences Investigation team looked into the claims.

These proved to be negative, and no such assault has occurred.


Wednesday, October 20, 2010

Charges for false rape report

A 21-year-old Melbourne woman who claimed she was raped on a beachside track in broad daylight will be charged with making a false report to police.

The woman told police she was jogging on a dirt track beside The Esplanade in Mount Martha, south of Melbourne, when she was attacked just after 5.30pm (AEST) on September 13.

Police on Tuesday said detectives had completed their investigation and were now satisfied no such event happened.

"Police wish to allay community fears and reinforce the fact that this incident did not occur and there is no one sought in relation to the matter," a police spokeswoman said.

"The 21-year-old woman is expected to be charged on summons with making a false report to police."

The woman had told police she was startled by a man standing on the dirt track exposing himself.

She said the man tackled her to the ground, removed her pants and then sexually assaulted her on the track.

She told police the attack only stopped when she bit him on the neck. She then fled to a nearby house to raise the alarm.


Tuesday, October 19, 2010

Everything you need to know about Anita Hill

WASHINGTON – The wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas called Anita Hill to ask her to apologize for accusing the justice of sexually harassing her, 19 years after Thomas' confirmation hearing spawned a national debate about harassment in the workplace.

Virginia Thomas said in a statement Tuesday that she was "extending an olive branch" to Hill, now a Brandeis University professor, in a voicemail message left over the weekend.

In a transcript of the message provided by ABC News, which said it listened to the recording, Thomas identified herself and then said, "I just wanted to reach across the airwaves and the years and ask you to consider something. I would love you to consider an apology sometime and some full explanation of why you did what you did with my husband. So give it some thought and certainly pray about this and come to understand why you did what you did. OK, have a good day," Thomas said.

When Hill heard the voicemail, she contacted Brandeis' public safety office, which in turn informed the FBI.

"I certainly thought the call was inappropriate," Hill, who worked for Clarence Thomas in two federal government jobs, said in a statement released Tuesday night.

Read the rest here.

She contacted public safety? Seriously?  And they contacted the FBI?

Talk about an overreaction.  But it tells us a lot about a person.

Donna Robinson admits making up rape claim in Southampton

A TAXI driver was locked up for almost a day and had his licence suspended for several weeks after an alcoholic drug abuser claimed he had raped her.

Donna Robinson launched a major police investigation after saying she had been attacked outside a Southampton bar. In reality, she had consensual sex with the cabbie.

The 27-year-old had rowed with her boyfriend and stormed off from a party after having taken a cocktail of alcohol, cocaine, cannabis and heroin.

Hours later, she gave police what prosecutor David Jenkins described as “a compelling account” of how she had been sitting outside The Edge nightclub when she was approached by two men, one of whom tried to kiss her. Despite putting up a struggle, she was dragged away, her jeans and underwear were removed and she was raped.

Robinson took police to the scene and described her ordeal.


Monday, October 18, 2010

Pulling false rape victims out of the shadows

In a 2003 Cosmopolitan Magazine article, former New York prosecutor Linda Fairstein, someone who really ought to know better, said this:   

"Having worked in this field for decades, I've found this phenomenon [of false rape claims] especially painful to witness. Innocent men are attested and even imprisoned as a result of bogus claims, and the precious resources of criminal justice agencies are wasted. But most appalling is that these falsehoods trivialize the experience of every real rape survivor."

So "trivializ[ing] the experience of every real rape survivor" is more appalling than the effect of a rape lie on innocent men and boys?  Really?  Does this include, for example, the men and boys killed, wrongly convicted and incarcerated, beaten, chased, spat upon, forced into hiding, and who otherwise lose everything -- their wives, girlfriends, jobs, businesses, life savings, sanity, and capacity for trusting women? 

Does that include these young men, Ms. Fairstein?

Down, down, down the rabbit hole we tumble.

The crime of making a false report about rape is unique in our jurisprudence because virtually the entire public discourse about it is dominated by persons who insist it is not a serious public threat.  At least not to men and boys. If it is a threat at all, it’s to women, they tell us.

Sexual assault counselors and feminist legal scholars contend that false rape claims are over-reported, that they get far more attention than they deserve. They even have a shorthand language for dismissing concerns about false rape claims.  They refer to false rape claims as one of the so-called rape “myths.”  They mock anyone who would voice concern about the false rape phenomenon by invoking Potiphars wife from the Book of Exodus, suggesting that the fear of false rape claims is both ancient and unfounded.  They gussy up their pre-ordained conclusions on this subject with all manner of disingenuous statistics, the results of the most vile, gender-politicized advocacy research where every untested claim of "rape" is believed, and "rape" includes sex that occurred after "psychological coercion." 

This despicable, pathetic caterwauling echoes from the deepest bowels of victimization politics. Worse, when the crime of false reporting of rape is reported by our purportedly objective news media, it is typically done so through a gynocentric lens that blinks at the harm it causes innocent men and boys and instead focuses on the greater harm -- the real harm -- the harm to hypothetical rape victims.

News reports about false rape claims take on an almost surreal cookie-cutter redundancy:  police typically adopt an indifference to the male victims, instead choosing to chide the false accuser for wasting police time. More disturbing is when a police officer, sexual assault counselor, or judge chides the false accuser for the "real" harm she's caused -- not to the man or boy wrongly accused or to other potential men and boys she might accuse -- but to phantom, hypothetical, unknown, potential, even unborn women whose reports of actual rapes might be looked upon with suspicion because of the lie.

The one thing that a judge is rarely heard to say in these cases is the following: “I need to make an example out of you so that women will stop falsely accusing men of rape.”

It is time to stop regarding the victimization of our daughters as more worthy of society's protection than the victimization of our sons. It is time to stop battling one crime (rape) by minimizing the seriousness of another (false rape claims).

It is time for victims of false rape claims to step out from the shadows, and it is time we stopped ignoring and trivializing their pain.

Newlywed jailed for false rape claim

A NEWLYWED woman who lied that she had been raped after a girls’ night out has been sentenced to a two-year jail term.

Emma Watson, who is deaf, broke down in tears after she was sentenced for falsely claiming she had been raped following a night out in Warrington town centre.

After the 32-year-old pleaded guilty at Liverpool Crown Court to perverting the course of justice, Judge Henry Globe QC jailed her.

He warned such false allegations make it more difficult for genuine victims to get justice, a message echoed by senior detectives in St Helens.

Liverpool Crown Court heard that Watson, who had been married for only six weeks, went out on November 7 last year with a group of women.

Prosecuting, Michael Stephenson said that while out she met a 20-year-old man and they returned to the home of the man’s parents and had consensual sex.

He said: “At some point she became distressed and this may be connected with the receipt of text messages from her husband expressing concern about her whereabouts.”

After claiming to her parents and husband she had been raped, Watson, of Fernhill Walk, Clock Face, repeated the allegation under police interview on Nov 17.

The man she accused was arrested on suspicion of rape and detained for 14 hours before being released on bail.

But in January she admitted the claim was false and apologised for the accusation.

Her defence solicitor Steven Swift said Watson recognised the gravity of her offence.

He suggested the false allegation was generated by “regret and pangs of guilt” about the damage having sex with the man would do to her marriage.

Judge Globe said: “"Every false allegation of rape increases the plight of those women who are the victims of this dreadful crime.

“It makes the offence harder to prove and, rightly concerned to avoid the conviction of an innocent man, a jury may find itself unable to be sufficiently sure to return a guilty verdict.”

Reacting to the sentence Detective Inspector Ged Seddon, of St Helens CID, said: "Merseyside Police will investigate and prosecute every complaint of rape thoroughly.

"If, during the course of an investigation, it transpires that the complaint is not true, then we will investigate that false allegation robustly.

"A false allegation of rape undermines the entire criminal justice system and detracts officers from supporting genuine victims of rape. Fortunately, these cases are very rare."


Friday, October 15, 2010

Rape Culture 101 -- In Praise of Miners and Rescuers

by Connie Chastain*

Earlier this week, like millions of people around the world, I watched the rescue of the 33 men who'd been trapped in a Chilean copper mine for 69 days.

Unfolding over an almost 24-hour period, the true-life drama was compelling. The rescue pod traversing a 26-inch hole drilled through solid rock, traveling the distance of more than two Empire State Buildings, tethered to the surface and light and life by a relatively small cable, a journey predicted to take an hour for each man. The myriad things that could go wrong. The order in which the men, ranging in age from 19 to 64, would be brought to the surface. It was all riveting.

As the rescue began, Fox News anchor Shepard Smith wondered whether the drama might become boring before all thirty-three miners were brought up from what easily could have been their tomb. Not a chance. To see each man's beaming face as he received the greetings and hugs of the rescuers and the President and First Lady of see the ecstatic reunions with family members and loved hear the details of how the men survived by faith, optimism and discipline -- well, it was the polar opposite of boring.

It was also a wonderful break from the churlishness and pettiness exhibited by so much of America's political class in the run up to the November elections.

Of course, the story of the Chilean miners is all over the Internet, as it has been all over television around the world. I can't begin to add anything to that coverage. I can only wonder how differently the story appears to ordinary folks as opposed to those who battle misandry, who advocate on behalf of men, and who are far more accustomed to seeing men demonized, ostracized, legally robbed and falsely accused -- not infrequently by the aforementioned churlish political class doing the bidding of institutional feminism.

As of this writing, the pro-man corner of cyberspace is relatively quiet about the drama, the sites I visit regularly making little or no mention of the story. But the feminist blogosphere's "coverage" is about what you might expect.

At Salon's Broadsheet, the story isn't about the breathtaking courage of the miners and masterful male ingenuity of the rescue... It's about how quickly Hollywood is jumping to exploit the drama ... the wife vs. mistress sidebar ... and how our president has hailed Chile's president....

Jezebel is even worse (how "love triangles" are complicating things for the miners)... I don't recommend visiting Jezebel shortly after dining. Or any other time, for that matter.

The gals at NOW appear to be completely oblivious to the entire event.

Of course the women who are feminists or who have fallen under feminist influence, aren't likely to be eager to recognize, let alone honor, masculine courage, bravery and extraordinary accomplishment. How can one honor such male positives and maintain that rape culture exists simply because men are men, the repositories of flawed masculinity?

Feminists and their puppets, political and otherwise, can wallow in their pettiness all they wish. The rest of us recognize the positives of masculinity, and are more than willing to honor extraordinary displays of it such as the world has witnessed in Chile. God bless the miners, their families and all those involved in the remarkable rescue.

*Connie is a member of the FRS team whose column appears here every Friday. Her blog is

Newport News teen charged with filing false rape report

NEWPORT NEWS — Police in Newport News have charged a 17-year-old girl with filing a false rape report, a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in prison and a $2,500 fine.

The girl has not been identified to the media because she is a juvenile.

Police spokesman Lou Thurston said that on Sept. 16, officers went to a home in the Dresden Drive area after receiving a report of a burglary and rape. The girl told officers she was home alone when an armed man accosted and raped her, then stole a firearm from the residence.

Several units, including a K-9 patrol and the special victims unit, investigated and the girl was taken to a local hospital for treatment. After an investigation that lasted several days, detectives determined that no rape or burglary had occurred. The girl was charged on Wednesday with filing a false police report.


I'm not sure if this is the same individual, but notice the additional details in the story:

NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (WAVY) - A 17-year-old girl told police she was raped last Thursday. Come to find out, she made the whole thing up, according to Newport News police spokesman Lou Thurston.

The teen reported she was letting her dog out when she turned around and a guy was standing there, Thurston said. She then proceeded to tell police that the armed man forced her to take off her clothes and raped her, while also stealing a gun from the home.

Several patrol units, including K-9, attempted to track the suspect. Special Victims Unit detectives also responded and began a thorough investigation, while the victim was taken to a local hospital for treatment.

After an investigation that lasted several days, it was determined that neither a rape or burglary every occurred, Thurston said.

The girl has since been charged in connection with the incident and police want to express how important it is that these people get charged. False reports take officers away from real investigations and waste time and money, Thurston said. It's a serious offense.

The teen has been charged with filing a false police report. Her identity is being withheld due to her age.

Filing a false police report is a class one misdemeanor punishable by up to twelve months in jail and a $2,500 fine.


Thursday, October 14, 2010

Woman charged for making false rape complaint against jailers

The Rutherford County Sheriff’s Office arrested a 37-year-old Antioch woman tonight on charges that she falsely accused two female officers of raping her.

Detective Lt. Todd Sparks identified the woman as Abimbola Lipford-Sims.

“She’s being booked into our facility,” Sparks said during a press conference in front of the County Jail.

La Vergne Police initially arrested her Wednesday on theft and violation of probation charges.

“During the booking process, special circumstances required the arrestee to change from her street clothes into different apparel,” states a news release from Major Preble A. Acton.

She was released Thursday and told a companion that she’d been raped by two officers while in her cell, Sparks said. The companion later came back to report what Lipford-Sims had said.

“We have to examine every single complaint that comes in,” Sparks said.

Detective Lisa Svitak interviewed Lipford-Sims and officers. Svitak also reviewed several hours of the jail system’s 24-hour video surveillance that records anything that happens, said Sparks, adding that Lipford-Sims was offered the chance to seek a medical examination to determine if she had been raped but declined.

Svitak also examined all booking records in determining that the officers acted in a professional manner and were falsely accused.

“They were actually very compassionate,” said Sparks, noting that Lipford-Sims could face up to a two-year sentence if convicted of a class E felony.

“After reviewing extensive video footage, gathering statements and interviewing all parties involved, Detective Svitak can find no evidence of any criminal act or misconduct by any member of the Rutherford County Sheriff’s Office,” Acton said in news release. “Taped footage clearly contradicts Lipford-Sims’ statement and reflects only compassionate and appropriate care by both female officers.”

The sheriff’s office obtained a warrant charging Lipford-Sims with filing a false report. Sparks, Svitak and newly appointed Detective Chuck Thomas of the U.S. Marshal’s District Fugitive Task Force and task force officers took her into custody before 5 p.m.

“Complaints of officer misconduct are serious matters and a means for citizens to aid law enforcement administration about employees’ conduct outside of direct supervision,” the news release states. “When used appropriately, the complaint process benefits both citizens and the Sheriff’s Office. However, blatant misuse is evident in this situation leading to officers being accused of a criminal act, which did not occur; therefore, the Sheriff’s Office will not release the two female officers’ names.”


Wednesday, October 13, 2010

Why I am not upset over an article that claims there is no more false reporting of rape than any other crime?

There is so much about this article -- about Germaine Greer's loony idea to have a Web site where women can name their "rapists" -- that is flat-out wrong. Including the assertion in the headline of this post. Including this assertion: "Women and children tend not to lie about these matters."

(In fact, rape is lied about more frequently than other serious crimes, and no one can say definitively that women and children "tend not to lie" about rape.)

So why am I not having a conniption over this piece?

Because unlike the vast majority of similar articles written from a decidedly feminist perspective, this one affords proper deference to the presumptively innocent accused of rape. Here's what the author says:

"Picture . . . the young woman or man (fewer men than women are victims of rape, but it does happen) crossed in love, or merely miffed at the way a member of the opposite sex has looked at them or spoken to them.

"How tempting might it be, late at night, with a drink or six on board, to log on to a website like the one Germaine Greer imagines and pour out your fury with an accusation of sexual assault or rape? A man’s reputation could be destroyed with no criminal inquiry, and no testing of evidence in court.
. . . .
"But going to a police station and facing real human beings who will question you about what you say happened, and carry out forensic tests, is a very different matter from turning on the computer in your own home and typing out whatever you like — knowing that there’ll be no comeback on you, and nothing but trouble for the person who’s incited your anger."

The author does, impliedly, trivialize the scope of the false rape problem by suggesting it is relatively rare. But she does not trivialize the harm to men and boys who are falsely accused. She recognizes the injustice of naming and shaming without due process.

In short, she is a feminist who doesn't blithely assert that women don't lie about rape, so what are the men worried about?

The purpose of this site isn't to prove, a la some Oppression Olympics, that false rape accusations are a "more" serious problem than rape. That's like comparing cancers. I have my own opinion well known to our readers, based on what I've studied, but that's kind of beside the point. The purpose of this site is to help raise awareness that false rape claims are a significant problem, and that the presumptively innocent, who too often are falsely accused, need protections that society simply isn't giving them.

And that's because the persons who've dominated the public discourse about rape for the past 30 years have insisted that women don't lie about rape, so what are the men worried about?

Woman admits lying about rape

Charges against a Calgary man accused of raping a woman over a 10-hour period nearly two years ago have been unexpectedly stayed.

Crown prosecutor Karuna Ramakrishnan issued the stay after the 44-year-old complainant, who recanted her story under cross-examination by defence lawyer Rebecca Snukal on Wednesday, failed to show up in court on Friday for further questioning.

She had been ordered to do so by Court of Queen's Bench Justice Sandy Park, so Ramakrishnan could reconsider her position.

John Francis Dionne, 43, had faced charges of sexual assault causing bodily harm, kidnapping, assault causing bodily harm and uttering death threats in connection with the alleged incident on Oct. 28, 2008.

His first trial ended in a mistrial in June, because of an issue with one of the jurors, and was rescheduled for this week.

The woman initially outlined in detail what she says occurred during the ordeal, but when cross-examined, she couldn't remember specific details.

Then, when asked why she would accept a ride from the man she claimed had raped her for 10 hours she became frustrated and denied it even happened.

"I'm lying about everything," she told Snukal.

"Hurry along because I'm lying about everything. He's not a rapist . . . so there, that's it. End of it . . . he didn't rape me.

"Let Mr. John Francis go free. He's not a rapist. It's over. That's all I have to say. Let him out."

Dionne, who had been in custody since his arrest, was to be released some time later on Friday.

The Crown has a year to revive the charges, but seldom does so unless new evidence arises.


Tuesday, October 12, 2010

When hate gussies itself up with tenure and PhDs, it often looks like misandry

Hamilton College requires “rape culture” shaming session for men

Beware college speakers paid to educate students on diversity — especially when the events are “mandatory.” This is the lesson one might learn from Hamilton College’s “required” event on “rape culture.” According to Samantha Harris at the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE), the event is “a program at which they will be pressed to acknowledge their personal complicity in a ‘rape culture’ on Hamilton’s campus and to change their ‘rape-supportive’ beliefs and attitudes.”

The creepy title of the event? “She fears you.”

But it’s not even just about rape. It’s about the more metaphorical rape too — the kind of “rape” that occurs whenever someone encounters an attitude that is unacceptable. Hence the program’s bureaucrat-in-chief pledges to “make this an environment where it is no longer acceptable in any way to objectify women or define masculinity as sexual conquest, or subordinate women’s intelligence, capability, and humanity, or allow issues of racism, classism, and homophobia to go unabated, then this campus will be a better place for all of us to be.”

Administrators at the New York college ignored criticism of the program, which came from a range of voices, from concerned alumni to the student body itself to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. Nobody seemed to be comfortable with the idea of requiring students to attend, but administrators perpetuated the myth that student ID cards would be swiped to ensure attendance. When students arrived at the event and it was clear no card swiping was happening, huge swaths of the audience departed.

Ashley Thorne at the National Association of Scholars sums it up best: “[W]hile it is said that today’s ‘rape culture’ has created a hostile environment for women, programs like this one tend to create a hostile environment for men. This emotion-driven presentation treats audience members as those in need of thought reform—bigots who must change their beliefs and actions.”

Oh, and if you’re wondering how much a browbeating chat like this costs, you have to call. The website notes that a single department can’t usually cover the full cost of the program, so it recommends pooling resources and applying for grants, like a $2,000 grant from the NCAA. And apparently, more than a few taxpayer-funded universities were quite happy to fork over the money, too.


I just got off the phone with Keith Edwards, who runs the “Men Ending Rape” program which includes the “She Fears You” program. He told The Examiner that he usually charges $2,000 per lecture plus travel expenses, but if there are more lectures over the course of more days, the cost can rise up to $5,000, possibly even $10,000. “It all depends,” he said.

But he objected to the characterization I offered of his program. I asked him if he agreed that the purpose of his program was to make it clear that those who did not speak out against “rape culture” were, in fact, complicit with it by being passive. He said yes. Isn’t that shaming? He didn’t respond.

I also asked him whether he felt that the sessions ought to be mandatory for students. At first he seemed uncomfortable with the question. “That’s really up to the universities… many feel that it’s necessary to mandate that students attend.” “But you? Do you think it should be required?” “It’s really up to the school.”

He did offer that it was legitimate for students to object to being required to attend the session. But he wouldn’t say whether he agreed with that objection. “The purpose of this is to empower people to speak up against things they don’t agree with,” he noted. Ironic, then, that he wouldn’t recognize people’s right to decide what event they did or did not want to attend. But he did offer this: “I don’t support any restrictions on people’s speech.”

That led to me asking him: “What about policies, based on your philosophy, that lead to universities punishing students for speech? If someone claims, for instance, that a student said something bigoted or racist or sexist — I’m not talking about a burning cross on someone’s lawn, but I am talking about someone saying something very, very offensive, possibly racist or misogynistic?”

“Well. That’s different.”

We couldn’t speak further, but it is interesting to get someone’s “social justice” perspective on people’s freedom of speech and freedom of conscience.

The truth is, Edwards runs a racket. If his seminars were optional for attendees, or if they had to pay for the seminars themselves, no one would attend. And if Edwards thinks I’m wrong, he’s welcome to test my theory out by writing into contracts that his seminars must only be optional.


No jail after conviction in false rape report

A follow up to our story HERE.

LEBANON, OH (FOX19) - A 21-year-old college student who said she claimed she was raped has been given a suspended sentence.

Kristen Lamb disppeared into the woods for 18 hours in May, and when she was found, said she had been abducted and raped, but the story quickly fell apart. She blamed her actions on stress.

She pleaded later that month to makingt false alarms, and was sentenced today to 180 days in jail, with 180 days suspended, and 2 years probation. This means she won't serve jail time unless she gets in trouble again.

She has also been ordered to serve 40 hours of community service, and pay the court costs, which total $480 for court hearings and following her in probation.

Lamb, who was a nursing student, showed up in her own yard tied up, and told her father she had been abducted. He called police, and a serious investigation began.


Man beaten bloody and senseless after false rape accusation

I wonder if the following news story recounts the kind of incident Catherine Comins had in mind when she said the following: Men who are unjustly accused of rape "have a lot of pain, but it is not a pain that I would necessarily have spared them. I think it ideally initiates a process of self-exploration. 'How do I see women?' 'If I didn't violate her, could I have?' 'Do I have the potential to do to her what they say I did?' Those are good questions.'"

Transient severely beaten after false accusation of rape

PANAMA CITY BEACH – A man was beaten bloody and senseless by an unknown group of people after someone falsely accused him of raping an intoxicated woman outside a bar early Sunday morning.

About 12:44 a.m. Sunday, the Bay County Sheriff’s Office was called to Newby’s Too, 4103 Thomas Drive, in reference to a sexual battery, according to an incident report. However, the woman who was identified as the victim said she had not been raped, and a man the crowd had detained as the perpetrator was in serious condition from a severe beating.

A deputy said the 41-year-old transient had been beaten so badly that his eyes were swollen shut and he couldn’t see. He was in and out of consciousness and could not tell authorities his name. Several people were holding rags on the man’s head to soak up blood.

While EMS treated the man, deputies spoke to the supposed victim and others present. The woman said she did not have sex with anyone; she had gone to the parking lot to lie down in a van that belonged to her boyfriend’s buddy. She was hot, so she took off her pants, she said. She saw several people taking the injured man from the van, but she didn’t know what happened.

The woman’s boyfriend said he had sent her to his friend’s van because she was intoxicated, according to the report. He wanted her to sleep it off. Later, he sent his buddy to check on her, and that’s when he found out the other man had been beaten up for supposedly raping the woman.

The man who owns the van told a deputy he had gone outside to check on the woman and saw a man on top of her. He believed the man was in the process of raping her. The report said the man “notified several people, unknown to him” of the attack, and the man was caught and “taken away.” He said he was not aware someone had beaten the alleged attacker until later.

A witness told deputies that he was in the parking lot and saw the supposed perpetrator running through the lot. He heard someone say the man had just raped a girl, so he tackled the man. Several others came over and took the man aside, and he did not see what happened next, he said.

The injured man was taken to Gulf Coast Medical Center for treatment. He had several head injuries, the report said. His eyes were swollen shut, his nose was swollen and bleeding, and he appeared to have blood coming from his eyes. He was coughing up blood.

When he regained consciousness, he told a deputy that he didn’t know how he got in the van or how he got to Newby’s; he denied having sex with anyone. He said he thought he was climbing in the van to get a ride to the beach; the deputy pointed out that he was already at the beach.

The man said he drank a fifth of whisky and two cases of beer that night.

He didn’t know any of the people who had beaten him and couldn’t identify them.

The case is still under investigation.


Charges for false rape report

A 21-year-old Melbourne woman who claimed she was raped on a beachside track in broad daylight will be charged with making a false report to police.

The woman told police she was jogging on a dirt track beside The Esplanade in Mount Martha, south of Melbourne, when she was attacked just after 5.30pm (AEST) on September 13.

Police on Tuesday said detectives had completed their investigation and were now satisfied no such event happened.

"Police wish to allay community fears and reinforce the fact that this incident did not occur and there is no one sought in relation to the matter," a police spokeswoman said.

"The 21-year-old woman is expected to be charged on summons with making a false report to police."

The woman had told police she was startled by a man standing on the dirt track exposing himself.

She said the man tackled her to the ground, removed her pants and then sexually assaulted her on the track.

She told police the attack only stopped when she bit him on the neck. She then fled to a nearby house to raise the alarm.


Monday, October 11, 2010

Women reprimanded over false Southport rape claims

A two for one story. 2 false claims in the space of 3 days. I'm hoping our UK readers can fill us in on if a Reprimand will carry any weight, such as being on their CBR?

TWO women have been reprimanded by police for making false claims of rape and sexual assault.

Following police enquires, two alleged incidents on Lord Street have proved to be unsubstantiated.

On Friday, September 24, a woman claimed she had been attacked in an alleyway next to the HSBC bank.

And, in the early hours of Sunday morning, another woman said she had been assaulted near to Barclay’s bank.

Detective Inspector Lee Turner, from Merseyside Police's Unity Team, said: “The two women who have made these false reports have been reprimanded for their behaviour and now realise that there are severe penalties for making false allegations of sexual assault and for wasting police time.

"The false allegations would undoubtedly have caused considerable concern to the community of Southport and we would like to reassure the public that these incidents did not happen.

“Southport is a safe place to visit and to enjoy a good night out."

He added: "We take all reports of offences extremely seriously and those who make false claims are committing a criminal offence.

“Anyone who is thinking of making a false report should be warned that we won't hesitate to take action against them.”


Cops: Girl lied about kidnapping, assault

Sept. 17--NEW HAVEN -- Police Thursday confirmed that a 13-year-old girl's claims of kidnapping and possible attempted sexual assault were lies.

While taking the report "seriously" and "devoting significant investigative time" to the case, "today we are announcing that this investigation is closed after learning that said abduction and assault did not occur as reported," Lt. Julie Johnson, the head of the department's special investigations unit, said Thursday at a news conference.

"An unfortunate incident has occurred, but we can ensure the community that there is no abduction and assault suspect on the loose related to this incident," she said.

She expressed gratitude to the community for its help but declined to discuss specific details about what actually happened.

Multiple sources Wednesday confirmed the girl admitted to detectives that she made up the report Monday of being abducted from her Fulton Street home. Police found her partially clothed behind a house on Chamberlain Street with assistance from the FBI and a device that was able to "ping" her cell phone.

The alleged victim is "receiving attention for her needs" and "for the privacy of the young girl and her family we will not discuss the private matters that contributed to this case or how the details of this investigation became known," police said.

The news came as both a relief and annoyance to residents.

Ken Johnson, of 25 Chamberlain St., expressed frustration over the entire episode. When an FBI agent using an electronic device to track the girl's cell phone led to his door, the agent ordered him handcuffed.

He was freed about 10 minutes later with a curt apology, he said.

"It bothers me a lot. I'm sad that she made this up and what she put everyone through and everything," he said.

He also was upset at his treatment by authorities by being pushed up against a wall and handcuffed in front of the neighborhood.

"I can imagine what the neighbors think about me," he said.

The missing persons report prompted a massive response from law enforcement. Dozens of police officers searched for the girl and later scoured the area or held perimeters in search of a suspect after she was discovered. Two off-duty officers, Paul Kenney and Bill Coppola, responded on their own time after hearing about the alleged abduction. A police dog searched the area, and a state police helicopter circled for hours Monday.

By Tuesday, police began to have doubts about her account and she recanted her report Wednesday.

Johnson said she didn't know how much the search cost or whether the girl might be charged with making a false report.

"It's a juvenile and we won't discuss that."

[FRS COMMENT] - Now that last comment, I have a serious problem with. You certainly don't have a problem naming a man who, by inference, was falsely accused.


Sunday, October 10, 2010

Germaine Greer's monstrously barbaric idea of a Web site where women can name their 'rapists'

That old feminist dragon Germaine Greer is at it again, this time, with an idea so monstrously barbaric that it merits no serious consideration -- a website where women name their "rapists."  See here.

First, let's briefly mention how this idea was raised.  At a speaking event, Greer was asked to comment about the recent female college grad's "fuck list," where a young woman named Karen Owen rates her sexual encounters with a number of male college athletes, complete with names, photos, and penile descriptions.

Greer said she did not regard the idea as "very female at all."

"It's a website where you talk about what it's like to get off with someone in terms of the size of his tackle. That's not what women are interested in."

Allow me to pause while I clean up the coffee I've just spit out.  "That's not what women are interested in"?  This, from the woman who, when she was 64 years old, posed with an 18-year-old nude male model on a television special that celebrated her book "The Boy."  Greer argued in that show, and her book, that traditionally the figure of the young male represents the ultimate in human beauty. Women, she posited, should be encouraged to look to boys for pleasure. "There are many ways in which a boy is an ideal fantasy partner for a woman."  Apart from being "easier to manage", he has more staying power in bed than an older man, she argued.  After all, she said, the sperm of a teenage boy "flows like tap water."  In the special, Greer visited an art class where the young male model posed nude for female art students. 

The "fuck list" is tame compared with the depravity of suggesting it is wholly proper for women to lust after teen boys' bodies.

But, if the "fuck list" isn't very female, what is?  Hang onto your hats.

"I wish there were an online rapists' register and that it was kept up to date, because we know the courts can't get it right.  When I say that to people, they get so scared, and say 'Oh you can't. What about privacy?'  Years ago I knew we would never get convictions in a court of law for date rape, so I suggested women kept an online dossier, so if a woman had a date with a guy and he did something to her, or frightened her, and she asked him to stop and he didn't, then instead of going to the police she should put him online.  Other women could check this dossier, look up a guy and see that he has form. Then she can say no, or if she does go, goes knowing it's a high risk strategy."

She continued: "I don't think a sexual bully should go to jail for seven years but a couple of months' community service wearing a t-shirt with the word 'rapist' on it would be good.  As it is we get nothing. They are still walking around and doing what they have done the whole time. 'There is always one guy, say at a university who gets through lots of girls like a knife through butter."

"What I suggest is that women keep an online diary and put on it if a man goes too far. Others can then check his 'form'. You want to be able to say 'avoid him because you will come out of the encounter feeling dirty.' 

Such a register, she insisted, would prevent rapes and sex assaults taking place more effectively than the legal system, which simply locks up a small minority of men who are convicted.

So exactly what's wrong with this idea? 

How much time do you have?

For starters, the fact that this Web site supposedly will help stop rapists does not excuse the incalculable harm it will do to the presumptively innocent men and boys falsely accused of rape.

How is it somehow acceptable to allow any woman or girl to unilaterally accuse, libel, and destroy any man or boy by branding him a "rapist" without even the pretense of due process?  With this new Web site, the trial for the hapless male would be over before it has begun. With one click of the computer's "enter" key, he would be convicted in the court of last resort -- the hearts of the general public -- because people would always assume, or at least seriously wonder, if he's a rapist simply because he was named. He likely will never get a decent job, or marry, or even live in peace in a decent neighborhood. He will be damaged goods, always and forever, until the day he dies. All because a lone woman or girl decided to destroy him and society allowed her to do it.

As every reader of this blog also knows, men and boys falsely accused of rape have been beaten and killed and have killed themselves; they’ve been fired from their jobs and lost their businesses; they’ve suffered from depression; they’ve lost their wives, their girlfriends and have been permanently alienated from their friends. Rarely do they ever come out of it whole, and for many, the ghost of a false rape claim trails them for the rest of their lives.

We need to be talking about granting anonymity to men and boys accused of rape until conviction, not naming and shaming -- and destroying -- them in this barbaric manner.

Greer's insane suggestion flows from a mindset that women don't lie about rape, which is simply rubbish.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

Another tiresome waste of time: a radical who insists that 'with rape, doubt is our go-to response even though false reports are as rare as unreported rapes are common'

Nancy Donoval, "a storyteller, story coach and communication consultant based in Minneapolis," has another of those radically tiresome commentaries about rape that insists we accept every allegation of sexual assault as an actual sexual assault, without any consideration for the implications of this rush-to-judgment mentality on the presumptively innocent.  Read it here. 

Donoval refers to the coverage of "the recent sexual assaults" at the University of Minnesota, not "the alleged recent sexual assaults," even though one of the allegations has been classified as unfounded and the others are under investigation.

Never mind that such a mindset does a grave disservice to the presumptively innocent accused of such crimes since, by necessity, they must be guilty if there was actually a sexual assault.  Donoval has precisely zero concern for them, presumably because, in her mind, males in general are getting away with rape all the time, so why concern ourselves with whether these particular males are innocent?

Donoval goes on to explain why so many rapes are unreported: "I was a college freshman in 1979, and I was raped at a frat house. It never occurred to me to call the police. I knew what had been done to me was awful, but I didn't know to call it rape."

So women don't report their rapes because they don't know how to characterize what happened to them, right? 

Well, no. As it turns out, Donoval's own purported personal experience has nothing to do with the story (but thanks for sharing).  Women don't report for altogether different reasons: "Rape still carries a stigma, and that fosters a culture both of silence. Silence and skepticism."

Never mind that the concept of underreporting is too politicized, too nebulous, too uncertain to say if it actually exists.  See here.  The "proof" proffered for underreporting ranges from unreliable to nonexistent, yet underreporting remains the Excalibur of the sexual grievance industry, the secret weapon with magical powers that is whipped out and wielded any time someone suggests the presumptively innocent are deserving of protection.  (And readers of this blog know the real story: thirty years of rape reforms and bending over backwards to get victims to "come forward" have been a waste of time.  Supposedly, underreporting is still rampant, and guess what? It always will be rampant no matter what happens because the sexual grievance industry needs underreporting, and will insist it exists at any cost.)

Getting back to Donoval.  Women don't report because they fear they won't be believed, she says. Donoval then proffers, apparently as proof of this assertion, the fact that the police have just completed their investigation into one of the claims and found it did not warrant prosecution.

"But that doesn't mean there was no assault," she says.

Now, please understand, there is no indication that the police investigation into this claim was in any sense flawed, but that's beside the point to Donoval.  Women are not reporting because police can't find enough evidence to prosecute them.  So, presumably, the only way for women to know they will be believed is for more young men accused of rape to be prosecuted and convicted, regardless of whether the evidence warrants it.  Isn't that the implication of Donoval's rant?  Dispensing with trivialities like due process and the burden of proof for males will encourage more women to come forward and report their alleged rapes. Get it?

Here's what the police said about that particular rape claim:  "We've spoken with everyone we could find, both the people who were interested parties and those who were not, both the young man involved and the young lady involved, and evidence does not warrant criminal prosecution."  And: the fraternity members "were extremely cooperative with us in the investigation. They really did go out of their way to assist us." As for the other alleged sexual assaults: police are still investigating.

So, someone please educate me. How do these incidents advance Donoval's argument?  Why would any presumably intelligent person think that citing an unfounded rape claim, and rape claims under investigation, will in any sense prove her point that that rape is rampant?  When Donoval says "but that doesn't mean there was no assault," the refutation is obvious: it means, madam, that no one -- including you -- can say one way or the other, and it would be grossly unjust to the dreaded males accused to suggest that a rape occurred in these circumstances.

Ah, but wait. Here comes her coup de grace:  "And with rape, doubt is our go-to response even though false reports are as rare as unreported rapes are common."

Just another way of saying that when a rape claim is classified as unfounded, it was almost always an actual rape and should have been treated as such.  The innocent be damned. 

Sigh.  Here we go again.  The same old feminist horse manure they've been peddling since the 70s.

What a tiresome waste of time these people are.